NICE-ESG-Libs Digest Thu, 6 Jul 95 Volume 1 : Issue 275
Today's Topics:
Donations
NICE Eiffel Standards Group -- Library Committee Mailing List
To post to list:
NICE-ESG-Libs@atlanta.twr.com
To send mail to the Chairman of the committee:
NICE-ESG-Libs-chair@atlanta.twr.com
Administrative matters (sign up, unsubscribe, mail problems, etc):
NICE-ESG-Libs-request@atlanta.twr.com
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 1995 14:53:35 +1000 (EST)
From: cmingins@insect.sd.monash.edu.au (Christine Mingins)
Subject: Donations
To: NICE-ESG-Libs@atlanta.twr.com
>
> Donations:
>
I think this is a good idea, but have some reservations/qualifications
to put:
I see in the future that NICE may 'sponsor' or 'endorse' clusters such
as time/date/timespan, containers, etc. For this to happen, the
classes must be written and presented in conformance to all the
stylistic and methodological purity which we apply to our own libraries -
(no reflection on your software Frieder, I'm sure it conforms!)
Such donations would therefore be subject to the same process as the
kernel library is currently undergoing.
Another approach would be for NICE to maintain a list of 'donated' libraries,
along with the address of the donor, and the ftp site where it is
available. This would keep the distinction between classes which have
been subject to formal endorsement and others.
The 'donation secretary' could maintain the list, and be responsible
for some kind of vetting of the donations to make sure they conform
to some basic standards before being added to the list.
Here at Monash we have developed a 'Quality Suite for Reusable Software'
which does just that kind of vetting of Eiffel texts. This could also
be a donation..
What does everyone else think?
-- Christine
> I suggest that Nice should accept donations - small, usefull libraries
> which are not important enough to be topic of a discussion. To start
> whis this we will supply two libraries for time/date/timespan and
> for format. All libraries should be available under all 3 compilers
> and should follow the GNU license.
>
> Maybe we could find someone for the duty of a "donation secretary" ?
>
> Whats your opinion?
>
>

|
|