This site contains older material on Eiffel. For the main Eiffel page, see http://www.eiffel.com.
NICE-ESG-Libs Digest        Mon, 27 Feb 95       Volume 1 : Issue 193

Today's Topics:
                            Call for votes


NICE Eiffel Standards Group -- Library Committee Mailing List To post to list: NICE-ESG-Libs@atlanta.twr.com To send mail to the Chairman of the committee: NICE-ESG-Libs-chair@atlanta.twr.com Administrative matters (sign up, unsubscribe, mail problems, etc): NICE-ESG-Libs-request@atlanta.twr.com
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 95 10:08:54 EST From: fhart@atlanta.twr.com (C. Frederick Hart) Subject: Call for votes To: nice-esg-libs Tower wishes to withdraw LIB95-TWR-PART_COMPARABLE and LIB95-TWR-COMPARABLE and instead support LIB95-PAJ-PART_COMPARABLE and LIB95-PAJ-COMPARABLE. We continue to support LIB95-TWR-HASHABLE and LIB95-TWR-HASHABLE2 and are eager to answer any questions concerning them. I do have several questions and comments regarding procedure: - Do we have a current list of voting members of the library committee? - In light of the committee rules for voting on change proposals, it would seem that calling for simultaneous votes on competing proposals, such as the ones on PART_COMPARABLE and COMPARABLE listed above, is unfair. The problem is that a significant majority of committee members could vote for one or the other proposal but neither would pass since a proposal requires greater than half of the active members on the committee to vote for it. I submit that competing proposals should be voted on serially rather than in parallel. Ideally, some effort would be made to resolve the two proposals so that a serial vote would not be necessary. - This brings up my last point of contention. I do not believe that it is fair to require a majority of current committee members to vote yes on proposal for a proposal to pass. I think that passage should simply require that more yes votes be cast than no votes. Abstentions, late votes, and failure to vote should not be counted as a no vote, as they currently are. These non-votes should not affect the calculation of a majority. -- Fred Hart (fhart@atlanta.twr.com) Tower Technology Corporation http://www.cm.cf.ac.uk/Tower/