This site contains older material on Eiffel. For the main Eiffel page, see http://www.eiffel.com.
NICE-ESG-Libs Digest        Sat, 18 Feb 95       Volume 1 : Issue 188

Today's Topics:
                       Publication of the PELKS


NICE Eiffel Standards Group -- Library Committee Mailing List To post to list: NICE-ESG-Libs@atlanta.twr.com To send mail to the Chairman of the committee: NICE-ESG-Libs-chair@atlanta.twr.com Administrative matters (sign up, unsubscribe, mail problems, etc): NICE-ESG-Libs-request@atlanta.twr.com
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 95 18:22:10 +0100 From: bertrand@eiffel.fr (Bertrand Meyer @ SOL) Subject: Publication of the PELKS To: NICE-Board@atlanta.twr.com, NICE-ESG-Libs@atlanta.twr.com, marc@eiffel.fr To: nice.board nice.lib Reply-to: bertrand@eiffel.fr Subject: Publication of the PELKS Copy to: marc From: Bertrand Meyer Mailer: BOOM A practical point in response to Steve Tynor: ISE has never refused an opportunity to have a technical meeting. ISE would be delighted to play host to a library meeting, for example during TOOLS USA. On the more fundamental issue: last summer the NICE library committee, after extensive work by many people, approved a document as the starting point for the kernel library standard. One of the ideas in the document was that of vintage: the standard is evolutionary, and there is an upgrade each year, as with a software product. To establish the credibility of Eiffel, we need a published document. That document can have all the precautionary notes to allay Steve's fears. It could for example be called ``Proposed Eiffel Library Kernel Standard'' and have an introduction stating that it is published for discussion. This is a win-win situation: - Nothing is cast in concrete. Discussions can continue for vintage 96. - We establish our image as a standard-conscious group. - We broaden the scope of interested people and potential contributors. Publishing this document now is a key step towards establishing the credibility of Eiffel. Note that the document is available by FTP to anyone who cares to access it. Nobody has objected to that availability. Publishing it in book form is a difference of degree, not nature. -- BM