NICE Language Committee: ms-addr-syntax
From Michael Schweitzer
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 94 11:35:53 +0200
To: bertrand@eiffel.com
Subject: MS-ADDR-SYNTAX
Cc: tynor@atlanta.twr.com
Content-Length: 470
X-Lines: 22
Status: RO
-----------------------------------------------------------
Key : MS-ADDR-SYNTAX
Title : Syntax of address expressions
-----------------------------------------------------------
Proposal:
I propose that the syntax for address expressions use
Feature_name
instead of
Identifier
in order to make it possible to take the address of an
infix or prefix feature.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Best regards,
Michael
From tynor@atlanta.twr.com Sun May 1 12:21:39 1994
Date: Sun, 1 May 94 13:30:34 EDT
To: langmey@eiffel.com, ms@ms.central.de (Michael Schweitzer)
Subject: VIP: MS-ADDR-SYNTAX
Content-Length: 197
Status: RO
X-Lines: 6
Michael has rightly chastised me for not voting promptly on the proposals
currently under discussion. I'll undertake to correct this forthwith.
On the matter of MS-ADDR-SYNTAX, I vote in favor.
From pertron.central.de!ms.central.de!ms@uranus.central.de Mon May 2 09:51:58 1994
Date: 02 May 1994 10:38:00 +0200
To: langmey@eiffel.com
Cc: tynor@atlanta.twr.com
Subject: Agenda: MS-ADR and ST-VZAA
X-Mailer: XP v3.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Length: 487
Status: RO
X-Lines: 18
Dear Bertrand, dear Steve,
This is a proposal concerning our agenda:
I propose that we put MS-ADR and the related topic ST-VZAA
in catalog 3.
Both proposals deal with the address operator in Eiffel.
Everybody has expressed his opinion about MS-ADR and I
believe that we need more time to think about this.
In my opinion, it doesn't make much sense to discuss this
any further (in the moment). We can put it on the agenda
again later.
Best regards,
Michael
## CrossPoint v3.0 ##
|
